"Sparse structual Gr\"obner basis detection" Karin Gatermann. Konrad-Zuse-Zentrum Berlin Takustr. 7 D-14195 Berlin Germany E-mail:gatermann@zib.de The detection of a term order such that an existing set of polynomials is a Gr\"obner basis is an important question since there are several techniques known to convert a Gr\"obner basis with respect to some term order to another Gr\"obner basis with respect to another term order. The well-known conversion techniques include FGLM-class algorithms exploiting linear algebra technique as well as the Gr\"obner walk by Collart, Kalbrener and Mall and its improvement, the fractal walk by Amrhein and Gloor. Also the Hilbert series driven version of the Buchberger algorithm uses the knowledge of a Gr\"obner basis with respect to some term order which is different from the order one is interested in. Sturmfels and Wiegelmann gave a method in order to find a term order such that the initial forms with respect to this term order form a Gr\"obner basis by the 1. Buchberger criterion (Structual Gr\"obner basis detection). That means that the leading monomials are coprime. Their method is based on searching for a maximal matching in a weighted bipartite graph and integer programming. In case there are more variables than polynomials partitions of the variables are considered. We analyse this approach for the case that the polynomials are sparse. Then first the appearance of monomials is investigated in order to bound the number of useful partitions. There are three informations necessary. First the supports (set of variables) of all appearing monomials are extracted. Then for each support the polynomials which include monomials with this support are extracted. The third information is a table with supports and the degrees of the polynomials in these variable groups. Based on the first two informations the partitions which makes sense for the structual Gr\"obner basis detection problem are determined. Secondly, the data of the weighted bipartite graphs are easily obtained from the table. This rearrangement of steps result in much fewer matching problems, much easier available data during this process and also less integer programming problems. Thus the complexity of the sparse structual Gr\"obner basis detection is much better than without exploiting sparsity. We will demonstrate this with examples.